SaaS Gross Margins Are Under Pressure (And It's Bad News for Valuations)

Rising cloud and AI-driven costs are eroding SaaS gross margins, directly and materially depressing valuations. Expert Todd Gardner breaks it down.

Back

The Cost of Compute 2026

Learn what 100 CFOs revealed about cloud infrastructure costs and how it impacts their P&Ls.

TL'DR

Todd Gardner is a US-based capital formation and valuation expert. He has funded over 100 SaaS companies and currently serves as managing director at SaaSonomics.

In a recent survey of 100 SaaS CFOs by Cloud Capital, 89% reported that rising cloud costs negatively impacted gross margins. 

In some cases, new AI development efforts have increased cloud costs. For others, traditional workloads are costing more because of AI-driven pricing pressure. Either way, declines in gross margin are putting significant pressure on SaaS valuations.

Let's unpack exactly why and how much.

The first step in understanding the role of gross margins in SaaS valuations is to forget SaaS valuations before 2021. Before 2021, the space was emerging, growing quickly, and investors assumed companies could transition to profitability in the future. This was rational at the time, and when growth slowed, valuations shifted from multiples of revenue to multiples of profit. During the revenue-multiple era, if your company had a "normal" gross margin, a few points one way or the other was not material in its valuation.

Now, however, because gross margins directly impact profits, they also directly impact valuations, and in a substantial way. Let's look at current public SaaS data to demonstrate.

The median gross profit margin of public SaaS companies is currently 78%, and the median operating profit is 18%. Hypothetically, if gross margins were to drop by five percentage points for a billion-dollar company, operating profit would fall from $180 million to $130 million. The decline in profits would be destructive to the company's valuation for three reasons. 

First is the simple math with a constant PE multiple of 30 (which is pretty close to the current median).

$180 million X 30 = $5.4 billion

$130 million X 30 = $4.0 billion

So, with a constant multiple, the valuation decreases by 25% given a 5-point decline in gross margins.

Second, since investors focus more on future earnings than on current earnings, and this company's earnings are shrinking, it's likely that its P/E ratio would drop dramatically below 30.

Third, COGS matter more to investors than operating expenses. Given the same level of operating profit, high-gross-margin companies are worth more. Why? COGS are variable expenses that are hard to cut without immediate negative consequences. New methods and efficiencies must be found to reduce COGS, and that's more difficult than cutting operating expenses to drive profits.

This example is a gross simplification, but it's still important to understand the basic math SaaS companies face. If a business is making big bets on AI, it might be able to explain away the gross margin decline, but only if it can back it up with data isolating core gross margins from development costs. (more on this in future posts)

As a core driver of profits, gross margins are a massive driver of a SaaS company's valuation, and they are headed in the wrong direction. Maintaining or improving gross margins in this environment needs to be on every CFO's radar.

Download ebook
SaaS Gross Margins Are Under Pressure (And It's Bad News for Valuations)

FAQs

No items found.
Last Updated
December 18, 2025
Get AWS savings plan

Get a free AWS compliance review.

Full breakdown

Current risk and coverage

Current and potential savings

Get Started