# Cloud Capital > Finance-grade cloud cost management for CFOs and CTOs at AWS-backed SaaS companies. Cloud Capital manages commitment risk, delivers accurate cost forecasts, and generates guaranteed savings without engineering effort or upfront financial exposure. Cloud Capital serves Series A and beyond SaaS companies whose AWS spend has become a significant operating variable. The platform gives Finance and Engineering one shared set of numbers — forecasts they can defend in the boardroom, savings that are guaranteed, and commitment coverage that eliminates financial risk. ## Solutions - [Commitment Optimization](https://www.cloudcapital.co/solutions/commitment-optimization): Cloud Capital manages AWS Reserved Instances and Savings Plans on your behalf, absorbing the financial risk of underutilization and guaranteeing a savings rate from day one. - [Visibility & Forecasting](https://www.cloudcapital.co/solutions/forecasting): Map cloud spend to business drivers. AI-powered forecasts from operating plans give Finance and Engineering a single source of truth. - [Cash Back on AWS](https://www.cloudcapital.co/solutions/cashback-savings): Every customer earns 5% cash back automatically on eligible AWS services — including compute, storage, databases, and AI/ML services like SageMaker and Bedrock — up to $100k/month in eligible spend, with no fees or engineering lift. ## How It Works - [How It Works](https://www.cloudcapital.co/how-it-works): Cloud Capital's three-step process turns volatile AWS spend into predictable, margin-protecting savings with no engineering lift and no upfront financial risk. ## Customer Results - [Customer Case Studies](https://www.cloudcapital.co/case-studies): Real results from Cloud Capital customers. - [Shiftmove](https://www.cloudcapital.co/case-study/shiftmove): 27.3% guaranteed savings rate on AWS commitments within 90 days, two-thirds reduction in risk exposure. - [Milk Moovement](https://www.cloudcapital.co/case-study/milk-moovement): 28.4% savings rate, $32,000+ saved within four months. - [Colossyan](https://www.cloudcapital.co/case-study/colossyan): 38% savings rate within 90 days for an AI video-generation platform. - [Metomic](https://www.cloudcapital.co/case-study/metomic): 19.5% savings rate, commitment coverage increased from 0% to 54%. - [Harbr Data](https://www.cloudcapital.co/case-study/harbr-data): 34.7% savings rate, commitment risk reduced from 100% to 21.6%. ## Research & Standards - [The Cost of Compute 2026](https://www.cloudcapital.co/the-cost-of-compute): Survey of 100 CFOs on managing cloud costs in 2026. - [Cloud Infrastructure Accounting Standards (CIAS)](https://www.cloudcapital.co/cloud-infrastructure-accounting-standards): Framework applying GAAP and IFRS discipline to cloud and AI infrastructure costs. - [CFO Cloud & AI Cost Classification Handbook](https://www.cloudcapital.co/whitepaper/cfo-classification-handbook): How CFOs should classify cloud and AI costs on the P&L. - [The CFO's Guide to Cloud Spend Efficiency](https://www.cloudcapital.co/whitepaper/the-cfos-guide-to-cloud-spend-efficiency): Reclaim cloud spend to extend runway and improve margins. - [How to Take Control of Cloud Spend in 90 Days](https://www.cloudcapital.co/whitepaper/how-to-take-control-of-cloud-spend-in-90-days): Strategic framework for CFOs managing AWS spend. - [The Smart CFO's Guide to AWS EDP Renewals](https://www.cloudcapital.co/learn/the-smart-cfos-guide-to-optimizing-aws-edp-renewals-for-maximum-value): Strategic framework for negotiating AWS Enterprise Discount Program (EDP) renewals for maximum value. - [Why Your Gross Margin is Wrong](https://www.cloudcapital.co/learn/why-your-gross-margin-is-wrong-the-cfos-guide-to-production-vs-non-production-cloud-spend): How CFOs should separate production from non-production cloud spend so gross margin reporting isn't distorted by R&D and testing costs misclassified as COGS. - [Rethinking Cloud Finance: How Cloud Capital Removes Commitment Risk](https://www.cloudcapital.co/learn/rethinking-cloud-finance-how-cloud-capital-removes-commitment-risk): Why shifting AWS commitment risk from customer to vendor lets companies capture multi-year discount pricing without losing flexibility. - [Insights](https://www.cloudcapital.co/insights): Cloud cost management guides, forecasting frameworks, and financial best practices. ## Comparisons - [Cloud Capital vs DoiT](https://www.cloudcapital.co/compare/cloudcapital-vs-doit-compare): Cloud Capital places commitments natively in your own AWS account and entity, with no pooled or shared accounts; DoiT's Flexsave temporarily transfers commitments into DoiT's account. - [Cloud Capital vs ProsperOps](https://www.cloudcapital.co/compare/cloudcapital-vs-prosperops): Cloud Capital sets a pre-agreed guaranteed savings rate and takes on the full commitment risk; ProsperOps offers optimization recommendations without a risk backstop or guarantee. - [Cloud Capital vs Archera](https://www.cloudcapital.co/compare/cloudcapital-vs-archera-compare): Cloud Capital places native commitments in your own payer account with full auditability; Archera's Insured Commitments are vendor-controlled instruments. - [Cloud Capital vs Pump](https://www.cloudcapital.co/compare/cloudcapital-vs-pump-compare): Cloud Capital's commitments sit solely within your own AWS Organization; Pump relies on cross-company pooled commitment structures. ## Company - [About](https://www.cloudcapital.co/about) - [Careers](https://www.cloudcapital.co/careers) - [AWS Partnership](https://www.cloudcapital.co/aws-partnership) - [FAQ](https://www.cloudcapital.co/faq) ## Legal - [Terms of Service](https://www.cloudcapital.co/legal/terms) - [Privacy Policy](https://www.cloudcapital.co/legal/privacy) - [Cookie Policy](https://www.cloudcapital.co/legal/cookies)